Who rule Maharashtra - Babus or Ministers?

The Chief Minister of Maharashtra Devendra Fadnavis has complained that many bureaucrats in his administration moved slowly and were not cooperating with his government's initiatives which ultimately hampered the people's works. He made the grievance publicly during a program in Nagpur and his comments attracted intense displeasure from the bureaucracy.  

Even political analysts and opposition leaders saw this complaint as a lame excuse by Fadnavis for many of the failures of his government. However, he could be forgiven for putting up a strong sentiment among the public on a public forum. Just a little more than a year, people watched him launch one after another attack on the ruling parties, when he was leader of opposition and state president of Bharatiya Janata Party.

Fadnavis is a very youthful CM and the citizens expected him to lead an enthusiastic and active government. However, ever since he sworn in on October 31 last year, his government was perceived going slow and having a staggered journey.  One reason for this laggardness was the constant opposition by the 'ally' Shiv Sena and another was the non-cooperation from babus.

After decades of Congress rule, these babus became very cosy with the Congress and Nationalist Congress Party. Except for four and half years’ rule of SS-BJP during intervening years, the officers enjoyed patronage and company of Congress leaders. Even today, they are uneasy to work with any other dispensation and many of them are said to be taking orders from former rulers. The people having their ears to the state secretariat in Mumbai even vouch that many of the bureaucrats routinely jest on their new masters.

Not that the mandarins in Mantralaya were quite competent during Congress rule or moved in haste during those years. Even when Congress was in power, the bureaucracy, in true Indian fashion and largely following the British tradition, worked at an excruciating pace. Some CMs tried to change this situation and were successful to an extent after acquiring stern postures over the years.

A. R. Antulay was one of such ruler who tried to rein in the babus and left his stamp on the administration. Antulay was known as a dynamic politician and attracted fame for his prompt and efficient decision-making. Not only he decided on matters instantly, he looked to it that they were implemented to the core. Shankarrao Chavan and Sharad Pawar came to be known as good administrators during their tenures as CMs. In fact, Chavan was so demanding in his functioning that he came to be called as Head Master.

Sadly, the latter CMs could not keep up the tempo and secretary-level officials got hold on the functioning of the government. Matters only got worsened during last two decades. 

The matters were confounded by the fact that most members of the BJP-SS cabinet, which is in place at the moment, are first-timers. CM Fadnavis himself leads the charge in this regard also. Eknath Khadse, the lone BJP minister in his cabinet who held the post during the saffron alliance’s last government from 1995-99, has not helped the matter in any way as he has not recovered yet from his fretting for not being made CM in Fadnavis’ place.

Thus, babus take advantage of their increase and they have the field left open for them as they claim more experience than the elected representatives who are technically their superiors. This has led to wrangling between two these arms of the government. It manifested some months ago when Environment Minister Ramdas Kadam kept thousands of files in limbo and refused to sign on them as secretary of his ministry wanted powers to sign on them. 

It took CM Fadnavis himself to intervene in favor of his cabinet colleague. However, the episode only reinforced the theory that the political and administrative branches of the government do not share bonhomie. No surprise then that governance has taken a beating in the Maharashtra and people are openly asking – who rules the state?

Read More

Where was your dharma then?

It is a common practice during the hunt that some men are used to create noise and push the prey towards a specific direction. The animal is taken towards a spot where it can be hunted be easily. The tamasha of returning awards, which the recipients got during earlier regimes, brings to memory the same practice. The self-styled authors and artists are crying hoarse in unison so that noise is created, government is forced to go in a particular direction and then it would be easier to hunt it down.

Those who are taking out their awards from the cupboards so that they could be returned claim that the freedom of expression is been curtailed in the country and the Fascist ideology is on the rise. Had they any iota of truth in their claim, one would have heed them seriously. However, the truth is otherwise. The questions are being raised on the hypocrisy of those who are shouting from their rooftops and these questions are being raised by none others than the one-time victims of their six-decade long hegemony.

“The same people who are raising voice for freedom of expression today controlled the fields of intellectual discussion and education. They had the monopoly. They made it their mission to trample any other thought than theirs. Where was their concern for the freedom of expression then,” asked noted Kannada writer S. L. Bhayrappa in Pune recently. Do the champions of free speech have any answer to this question?

Bhayrappa is not just another writer. He is among the pinnacles of the modern Kannada literature. His novels have established records in terms of popularity, sale and the appreciation of the critics, not only in Kannada but also in Indian literature. Every type of dirty trick was used to keep any government recognition or award from him.

Patil Puttappa is a noted Kannada writer and journalist. When Bhayrappa was sidelined and Dr. Chandrashekhar Kambar was awarded the Jnanpith Award four years ago, he openly said that a “big lobby was behind the selection of the awardee”.

Another noted writer Girish Karnad had come to Pune three years ago when he was asked a question about Bhayrappa. At that time, he had said, “Bhayrappa writes well, but he was swayed by Hindutva”. Thus, it doesn't matter what or how the author has wRritten, the only important point was that which ideology he followed.

This is why it assumes extra edge when Bhayrappa says that he was the victim of the suppression of free speech by the Leftists and they had no right to speak about of the freedom of expression. No more elaboration is needed about the inherent motives of the pre-planned outrage of the Leftists.

This was not the first sledgehammering on the one-sided love for freedom of expression of the Leftists. One such voice had come forward last month even before this bout of coordinated campaign of returning the awards started.

That was the voice of Prof. Sheshrao More. Prof. More is known for his extraordinary research on contemporary issues and mainly for his books on Veer Sawarkar which seek to change established conventions of the great freedom fighter and thinker. Besides them, he has written books on Kashmir, revolt of 1857 (which he says was a jihad and corroborates it with proofs) and the partition of India. Such is his exquisite detailing and solid writing, that a challenge was put at the time of third book that if anybody comes forward to refute claims in this book, another book on it would be published.

But alas, Prof. More refuses to portray Nehru as hero and Leftists as prophets of progressive thoughts, hence he was almost ostracized by the intellectuals in Maharashtra. However, last month, he was the President of the Vishwa Marathi Sahitya Sammelan held in Andaman and he fired first salvo on the hypocrisy of the seculars.

While attacking the self-styled progressives, he coined a term the Terrorism of Progressives which created a flutter in the progressive camp. Then either Prog. More was overlooked or he was termed a Hinduist. However, Prof. More was saying the same thing what Bhayrappa said recently and that many in the past said - the Leftists' love for freedom of expression was not absolute. It comes to fore only when their voice becomes feeble.

As for Maharashtra, there is another famous example in the form of late P. B. Bhave. Considered one of the four pioneers of the new age short story in Marathi, Bhave never received the acclaim he deserved mainly because he was a Hinduist writer, proud follower of Veer Sawarkar. What is more, when he was the president of the Marathi Sahitya Sammelan in 1977, the literary meet itself was thwarted. None of the artist or author fel free speech having been curtailed then. It was only since last year, when Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister, that they felt country was filled with the atmosphere of hatred.

This is very reminiscient of the Karna, who invoked the Dharma, when the wheel of his chariot got damaged. The question which Krishna and Arjun put before him then can be put today to the Leftists, Socialists and the self-styled intellectuals - Where was your dharma then?

Read More

Allies Keep Their Honor Intact

It was no less than a clash of titans and the whole of Maharashtra, at least the Maharashtra that takes interest in politics, was looking at it anxiously. The Kalyan Dombiwali Municipal Corporation's election promised a close, almost bloody fight and it turned out to be so. However, in the end, both the two parties could claim final victory but managed to keep their honor intact.

Even though Shiv Sena and Bharatiya Janata Party share the power in the state and the center, neither of the parties shares cordial relations. Not that they had sweet memories of their co-habitation for the last 25 years, but their relations have touched ridiculously low during last one year. Ever since severing ties in last October, none of the saffron party has made any sincere attempt of reconciliation. Even after seating side by side in the state cabinet, they have not really accepted each other. Therefore, when these two allies faced each other in KDMC election, all eyes were set on what ensured to be the fireworks.

The campaigning for the election lived up to that promise. Both Shiv Sena executive president Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis left no stone unturned and indulged in freestyle wrestling with their verbal attacks. Cases of attacks, on the workers from and by both parties, were reported and registered. Even bullets were fired before ballots and the politics in this neighboring city of Mumbai turned bloody.

In the final phase of the campaigning, the fight became even murkier as Thackeray and Fadnavis dropped all pretentions and indulged in mud slinging. The verbal duel led to some uncharacteristic remarks as well by Fadnavis.

However, as results rolled out from the electronic voting machines on Monday, Shiv Sena seemed to edge past winning post during the early rounds and BJP managing to post honorable tally. However, the dance of democracy could be seen in full vigor by late afternoon, as Shiv Sena remained 10 seats away from the majority and BJP almost running neck to neck to it. It is clear that Shiv Sena will be able to muster majority, with the help from Maharashtra Navnirman Sena and independents, while BJP can boast of increased strength - its tally having gone up to 42 from the 9.

Neither Shiv Sena lost its hold on the backyard of Mumbai, its strong bastion literally, nor BJP was wiped out before the former's blitzkrieg. All other parties, including Congress, Nationalist Congress Party, MNS and others just drifted away in the barrage of these two parties; and meanwhile, Majlis-E-Ittehad-ul-Musalmin got away with two seats in its first ever test of strength. That was the real danger bell for the self-proclaimed 'secular' parties! 

Read More